![]() |
Photo Service Archéologique Départemental des Yvelines |
With the translation of this statement site Ecran de Veille de l'Archéologie (Screensavers Archaeology) the group of archeologists from the Rhone-Alps French published in the March 1st show an example the degradation process methodology that we have reported on numerous occasions.
"The similarities between Spain and France? Although it is a national institute, the INRAP, the budget reduction involves a setback just as depriving methodological scientific thinking necessary preventive archaeological activity and turning it into a mechanical process aimed to detect only the presence of deposits. Is reduced to a binary reality: Whether there site, which, at the end of the argument, is there or not be involved, or what is the same, this will end before and will cost less money. The entry of private firms in competition the INRAP together in the same process, then, the precariousness of their employees necessarily involves the acceptance of cost reduction in the same diagnostic task.
What are the differences? The strength of the Rhône-Alpes archaeologists that seen at the end of the text that originates in its capacity as public officials who refuse to accept working conditions that degrade the performance of the profession. But ... with private sector competition alluded to how much time they can handle the pressure? If we consider that at the same time is trying to reduce the stability employment through the elimination of so-called Activity Contract (Contrat d'Activité ), according to the Trade Union Solidaires , based on a mission and not in a period of time, set up by the way INRAP experimental early 2010, it appears that the future of the public school, which is increasingly diminished its powers to be very promising.
"Archaeologists of the Rhône-Alpes region we are worried by reports that have come on the budgets of 2011 and the new provisions on resources allocated a los diagnósticos arqueológicos: 8,5 días / persona por hectárea no permiten realizar nuestro trabajo de arqueólogos.
¿Es preciso recordar nuestra profesión de arqueólogos? Hacer un diagnóstico no sólo es para detectar la presencia de restos arqueológicos, sino también para caracterizar los yacimientos. Recordemos que la inter-región de Rhône-Alpes, Auvergne tiene una configuración morfológica y estratigráfica diversa, compleja y desarrollada, que no permite reducciones presupuestarias. ¿Cómo cumplir en estas condiciones con los requisitos mínimos del 7% de sondeos que establece el Estado para llevar a cabo la actividad arqueológica? After 30 years of preventive archeology in Rhône-Alpes, now witnessing a cash back of our profession and its goals.
surprising that such provisions have been adopted, against the advice of the CIRA East (Commission Inter-régional de la Recherche Archéologique) who protested against these practices prevailing in the Lorraine region, through a motion reflected in the record of 20 and 21 November 2002. As indicated in a document submitted for this reason the CNAR (Conseil national de la recherche archéologique) in February 2003: "... the almost exclusive use of trenches as the reference method for surveys, the absence of sufficient scientific cooperation before and after the intervention on the ground, emptied of its contents the scientific diagnosis. The absence, observed, testing of structures and stratigraphic controls, further strengthens this deficit worrying. If detection is one of the objectives of the process, we will certainly point out emphatically that the remains should also be characterized. This applies equally to all types of deposits. Recall that for a large number of these, the diagnosis will become the only source of scientific knowledge, whether for scientific, technical, financial or not to continue the operation ground and not dig. "
Since 2003 we attended a methodological retreat endangers archeology.
In this state of affairs, we report that the archaeologists of the inter-region Rhône-Alpes, Auvergne, we categorically deny to intervene in these conditions. "
¿Es preciso recordar nuestra profesión de arqueólogos? Hacer un diagnóstico no sólo es para detectar la presencia de restos arqueológicos, sino también para caracterizar los yacimientos. Recordemos que la inter-región de Rhône-Alpes, Auvergne tiene una configuración morfológica y estratigráfica diversa, compleja y desarrollada, que no permite reducciones presupuestarias. ¿Cómo cumplir en estas condiciones con los requisitos mínimos del 7% de sondeos que establece el Estado para llevar a cabo la actividad arqueológica? After 30 years of preventive archeology in Rhône-Alpes, now witnessing a cash back of our profession and its goals.
surprising that such provisions have been adopted, against the advice of the CIRA East (Commission Inter-régional de la Recherche Archéologique) who protested against these practices prevailing in the Lorraine region, through a motion reflected in the record of 20 and 21 November 2002. As indicated in a document submitted for this reason the CNAR (Conseil national de la recherche archéologique) in February 2003: "... the almost exclusive use of trenches as the reference method for surveys, the absence of sufficient scientific cooperation before and after the intervention on the ground, emptied of its contents the scientific diagnosis. The absence, observed, testing of structures and stratigraphic controls, further strengthens this deficit worrying. If detection is one of the objectives of the process, we will certainly point out emphatically that the remains should also be characterized. This applies equally to all types of deposits. Recall that for a large number of these, the diagnosis will become the only source of scientific knowledge, whether for scientific, technical, financial or not to continue the operation ground and not dig. "
Since 2003 we attended a methodological retreat endangers archeology.
In this state of affairs, we report that the archaeologists of the inter-region Rhône-Alpes, Auvergne, we categorically deny to intervene in these conditions. "
0 comments:
Post a Comment